Monday, July 20, 2009

Off-Season Trades

Since the purpose of the Pick and Roll Call league is continuity between years, heightened competition, and fully enabled geekery, it would be woefully inappropriate for the league not to feature off-season trades. And so it shall.

Here's the deal: between now and the draft, you can trade any of your keeper rights to another owner for any of their keeper rights. Here are the rules:

(1) You can only trade the keeper rights of a keepable player (meaning a player on the list of keepable players here).

(2) Once you engineer a trade between you and another owner(s), all owners involved will send me an email saying they agree to the trade. After receiving those confirmations, I will send an email to the league. This email to the league is the equivalent of clicking the "Accept Trade" button during the season -- the trade is binding at that point. The only way the trade doesn't go through at that point is . . .

(3) . . . if, during the next week-long review period, a majority of the remaining league members vote against the trade. This works the same way as during the season as well (meaning you should vote "nay" only if you suspect collusion and unethical behavior, like Alan offering the rights to Ronnie Brewer and a case of beer under the table to Chris for his rights to Danny Granger).

(4) Exactly one week after my league-wide email announcing the trade (based on the timestamp of that email), the trade becomes final, and the rights are swapped.

(5) All trades must be finalized before the Off-Season Trade Deadline (meaning the week-long review period must end before the Deadline). Coincidentally, this is the same deadline as the Keeper Declaration Deadline, which is two weeks before the draft. It's real simple, kids: if you want to keep a player that's not on your team, you have to acquire that player's rights so you can declare him a keeper. You can't declare him a keeper after the Keeper Declaration Deadline. So, you better get that trade done three weeks before the draft, at the latest.

One more ground rule: these trades can only involve the keeper rights to playas. You can't trade draft picks, beer, baseball cards, or anything else of value in conjuction with these trades. Other than that, have at it: you can do 2-for-1 deals or 3-for-4 deals; you can engineer three-team mega-swaps; whatever. Each team has different assets and different strategies, so it should prove fertile for trades. I'll be disappointed if nobody wheels and deals this off-season.

Wednesday, April 15, 2009

Final List of Keeper-Eligible Playas

Since the season is almost over (after tonight, there can be only one -- and yes, I went with the Highlander wording of the phrase, not the NBA wording, because the NBA totally ripped off Highlander, merely transposing the "be" and the "only" like that made it alright -- I mean, come on), the list of players eligible to be kept for next year is set. The following list (alphabetized by team name) contains all the players eligible for keepage. If a player is not on the list below, he can't be kept (pretty simple). As a reminder, the deadline for declaring your keepers (up to 4 guys per team) is two weeks before next year's draft, i.e. sometime during next year's preseason, i.e. a while from now.

This off-season will not be devoid of action, however, and you should all pay attention to the blog and be prepared to receive emails from the 'ol Commish about updates and issues. As a primer on what you can expect in this space in the upcoming weeks:

(1) I'm working on the 2008-2009 League Awards right now (I guess I should mention that Chris helped out a little, in that he did much of the writing, much of the analysis, all of the number crunching, all of the number gathering, and came up with many of the awards himself -- not that they're his awards or anything, my being The Commish and technically the only one with the constitutional power to bestow awards upon anybody, but I thought I'd mention it; let's just say he had a hand in the final product and leave it at that). We (um . . . I mean "I") expect to have them posted within a week or so. And they're going to be dope.

(2) Sometime soon, since the standings will be set, we'll be doing the Meta-Draft Lottery. As we established in our prior vote, we'll be lotterying off the top three picks in the Meta-Draft. I hope to have video of this or something (a live webcast would be awesome, but I don't know if I'll be able to wrangle the technology -- suggestions are welcome). Soon after this, of course, will be . . .

(3) . . . the Meta-Draft itself -- the draft-before-the-draft wherein we determine the order of selection in the Real Draft. As we determined by league vote, we'll lottery off the top three picks in the Meta-Draft -- that is, we'll pick out three names in the Meta-Draft Lottery and they'll be the first to select where they want to draft next year (the remaining order in the Meta-Draft will follow reverse of league finish, meaning the last-place team will never fall below fourth pick in the Meta-Draft). I haven't completely determined the procedure for the Meta-Draft yet, but it'll be a rolling thing that will take place over several days/weeks: the winner of the Meta-Draft Lottery will go first and have a certain period of time to determine and post which draft slot s/he wants, and then the next person will go, and then the next -- all done either by email or on this blog, or some such thing.

(4) In addition to those very important matters, there will be certain updates about rules and procedure as we move into next year (which will be the first true year of our keeper experiment). So stay tuned.

Now, without further ado [EDIT: actually, with just a little more ado -- next to each player name I've added in parentheses the round in which they can be kept (I ran the formula for all the FA pickups and bumped up all the drafted playas); some players will have two numbers to reflect the exception for players in the top four rounds if the player before them is also kept -- see the Rules post for a refresher]:

2008-2009 PLAYERS ELIGIBLE FOR KEEPAGE (by team)

28 Light Years Old
Al Harrington (8)
Andre Iguodala (3,4)
Charlie Villanueva (9)
Chris Bosh (1,2)
D.J. Augustin (14)
Francisco Garcia (10)
Greg Oden (4)
Jameer Nelson (12)
Jose Calderon (2,3)
Kobe Bryant (1)
Lamar Odom (6)
Matt Barnes (11)
Nick Collison (13)
Nicolas Batum (15)
Ray Allen (5)
Stephen Jackson (7)

Balding Ballers
Anderson Varejao (14)
Jason Kidd (3,4)
Joel Przybilla (13)
Kevin Durant (2,3)
LaMarcus Aldridge (6)
LeBron James (1)
Michael Beasley (5)
Pau Gasol (1,2)
Paul Millsap (10)
Sebastian Telfair (15)
Tony Parker (7)
Wilson Chandler (11)
Yao Ming (4)

Block O
Al Jefferson (1,2)
Anthony Parker (8)
Anthony Randolph (16)
Carlos Boozer (1,2)
Chris Paul (1)
David West (3,4)
Eric Gordon (13)
Jamal Crawford (5)
John Salmons (9)
Kenyon Martin (8)
Luis Scola (12)
Rudy Fernandez (10)
Steve Nash (2,3)
Travis Outlaw (15)

Brew-Ha Bandits
Andrea Bargnani (14)
Deron Williams (1,2)
Mo Williams (7)
Paul Pierce (3)
Ronnie Brewer (10)
Shawn Marion (1)
Tayshaun Prince (11)
Troy Murphy (8)

Del Harris Del Negro
Dwyane Wade (1)
Antawn Jamison (3,4)
Hedo Turkoglu (4)
Jason Thompson (16)
Joe Johnson (2,3)
Mario Chalmers (10)
Nate Robinson (12)
Rajon Rondo (8)
Ramon Sessions (12)
Russell Westbrook (14)
Spencer Hawes (15)
Thabo Sefolosha (16)
Tim Duncan (1,2)
Zydrunas Ilgauskas (11)

Liberal Elite Media
Al Horford (5)
Brandon Bass (16)
Chris Andersen (11)
Chris Duhon (11)
Corey Maggette (3,4)
David Lee (6)
Derrick Rose (7)
Dwight Howard (1)
Flip Murray (16)
Josh Smith (1,2)
Kevin Martin (2,3)
Marc Gasol (13)
Rasual Butler (12)
Ronny Turiaf (10)
Ryan Gomes (13)
Trevor Ariza (11)

Mao Meow ZeMeow
Andre Miller (5)
Ben Gordon (10)
Caron Butler (1,2)
Chauncey Billups (3,4)
Chris Kaman (4)
Drew Gooden (13)
Jermaine O'Neal (7)
Kendrick Perkins (15)
Kevin Garnett (1)
Leandro Barbosa (8)
Marquis Daniels (16)
Nene Hilario (11)
Nick Young (16)
T.J. Ford (7)
Udonis Haslem (15)
Zach Randolph (9)

Nutcrushers
Antonio McDyess (15)
Brad Miller (7)
Brook Lopez (12)
Carmelo Anthony (2)
J.R. Smith (10)
Jeff Green (13)
Kevin Love (9)
Kirk Hinrich (9)
Larry Hughes (16)
O.J. Mayo (8)
Raymond Felton (9)
Rodney Stuckey (12)
Thaddeus Young (11)
Vince Carter (4)

Phi Slamma Jamma
Baron Davis (1)
Delonte West (13)
Emeka Okafor (4)
Gilbert Arenas (6)
Grant Hill (15)
Jason Richardson (3)
Mike Bibby (8)
Monta Ellis (10)
Rashard Lewis (2)
Richard Hamilton (9)
Richard Jefferson (5)
Shane Battier (10)
Shaquille O'Neal(13)
Steve Blake (13)
Tyrus Thomas (11)
Vladimir Radmanovic (16)

YoungNoMo'
Boris Diaw (12)
Brandon Roy (3)
Danny Granger (1,2)
Devin Harris (6)
Dirk Nowitzki (1)
Gerald Wallace (4)
Jason Terry (8)
Mehmet Okur (5)
Mike Conley(12)

Monday, March 9, 2009

Determining Draft Order and Money

As discussed on the league page, we have two big issues to resolve: (1) whether there will be an official money wager associated with the league and (2) how we will determine draft order for next year and the years ahead.

Deadline(s)

I know we had discussed previously that the money issue might influence votes on the draft order issue, so we're going to have a tiered deadline in this thing. I'll open voting for both issues right now. If your draft order preference is uninfluenced by whether we have money (according to the voluntary money parameters outlined on the league page and below), then feel free to vote on both right now. If your draft order preference will depend on whether we have the voluntary money wager, wait until the results of the money vote are tallied and then vote on your draft order preference.

In order to achieve the above staggering, all votes regarding money (as outlined below) must be submitted no later than midnight (Pacific) Friday, March 13 (another Friday the 13th this year; spooky). I'll tabulate and post results on the league page sometime Saturday, March 14. Voting on the draft order will close at midnight (Pacific) Tuesday, March 17, to give those who were waiting for the money vote time to get their votes in. I'll post the results on the league page on Wednesday, March 18, well before the beginning of the playoffs (remember: if you want to keep a guy, he must be on your roster before the playoffs start and must stay on your roster through the end of the season). If either vote is completed before the deadline (i.e., everyone gets their votes in early), I'll just post the results ahead of time.

Voting Procedure

You can vote in one of three ways: comment to this blog post; comment on the league page; or email me (or beermail, if you are so inclined). My email address is on the league page (follow the "Managers" link at the top of the page). Whenever and wherever you vote, include your team name in the vote.

In your vote, choose one option for each "ballot initiative."

Ballot Initiative #A: Dolla Dolla Billz, Y'All

For a more extensive explanation of the options, please see my comment on the league page. When you vote, just say which number you're voting for.

We'll do option 2 if at least 5 people vote for it (voting against it doesn't mean that you can't participate; if it passes, everyone will have the option of doing it if they want to).

The options:
  1. No organized league-wide money bet (this does not preclude informal side bets between two or more league members, it just means that I, as league Commish, won't be collecting money, enforcing a deadline, and doling out the cash winnings).
  2. A voluntary league-wide money bet (where everyone in the league can opt in, but nobody is forced to participate). If this passes, we can haggle on the amount of the buy-in, but it won't be more than $25/person, and the payouts (whatever the buy-in) will be as follows: 3rd place will get their money back; 2nd place will get double the buy-in; 1st place will get the rest.

As stated above, please submit your vote for Ballot Initiative #A by midnight (Pacific) Friday, March 13.


Ballot Initiative #B: Draft Order Options for Next Year

In our previous discussions, some people expressed that they might want to do something different next year than they would going forward. This vote, on Initiative #B, is for next year only. Initiative #C will be for years after next year. If you want the same method for next year AND the years following, just vote accordingly; the options for #B are the same as #C, so vote for the same option on each Initiative.

If you want to vote for one of the options 6-9, and you want to know what the weighting of the odds will be, the answer is that it will roughly follow the odds for the regular NBA draft (see the explanation of the process here and here; basically, the worst team will have about a 25% chance of getting the top pick/choice and some ridiculously high chance of getting a top-3 pick/choice). I can't/won't replicate exactly what the NBA does, assigning teams up to 250 sets of 4-digit combinations (out of 1000) and then pulling numbers out of a hat to get those combinations and thus the draft order, etc., because that's crazy. The method I have in mind is replacing the 4-digit codes with pieces of paper in a hat and rounding off the decimal points so I can use 100 little pieces of paper (instead of 1000). The worst team will get 28 pieces (since we're cutting out picks 11-14 from the NBA model -- we only have 10 teams, so we only need 10 picks -- the numbers don't add up exactly, so I thought I'd give the worst team a little bump in the odds with three extra chances), second worst will get 20, third worst will get 16, fourth worst will get 12, fifth worst will get 9, sixth worst will get 6, seventh worst will get 4, eighth worst will get 3, ninth worst will get 2, and tenth worst (i.e., league champion) will get one measly piece of paper (which can still hit the jackpot; just ask the Bulls). The first name plucked from the hat would get the first pick/choice. The second unique name plucked would get the second pick/choice, and so on (according the the parameters of options 6-9, since they differ slightly).

It should be stated, too, that in all of the options, the draft order will snake: the order for even rounds will be the reverse of the order for the odd rounds.

If none of the options gets at least 5 votes, we'll have another vote between the top two vote-getters.

The options:

  1. Last place finisher gets first pick in the draft; rest of first round follows reverse of league finish.
  2. First place finisher gets first pick in the draft; rest of first round follows order of league finish.
  3. Last place finisher gets to choose his/her draft slot first; next worst finisher gets to pick his/her slot next (and so on in reverse order of league finish).
  4. First place finisher gets to choose his/her draft slot first; next best gets to pick their slot next (and so on in the same order as league finish).
  5. Random order.
  6. Draft lottery wherein the last-place finisher gets the best odds of getting the first pick in the draft (conducted in the same way as the NBA draft lottery, where only the top three picks are lotteried off -- picks 4-10 will follow reverse of league finish, just like in the NBA).
  7. Draft lottery wherein the last-place finisher gets the best odds of getting first choice of all the draft slots (similar to #3 above, only in lottery form, and following NBA draft lottery rules as in #6 where 4th choice through 10th choice will follow reverse of league finish).
  8. Same as #6, except ALL picks will be lotteried off.
  9. Same as #7, except ALL draft slots will be chosen by teams, and the order of choosing will be entirely determined by lottery.

Ballot Initiative #C: Draft Order Options for After Next Year

Again, if none of the options gets at least 5 votes, we'll have another vote between the top two vote-getters.

The options:

  1. Last place finisher gets first pick in the draft; rest of first round follows reverse of league finish.
  2. First place finisher gets first pick in the draft; rest of first round follows order of league finish.
  3. Last place finisher gets to choose his/her draft slot first; next worst finisher gets to pick his/her slot next (and so on in reverse order of league finish).
  4. First place finisher gets to choose his/her draft slot first; next best gets to pick their slot next (and so on in the same order as league finish).
  5. Random order.
  6. Draft lottery wherein the last-place finisher gets the best odds of getting the first pick in the draft (conducted in the same way as the NBA draft lottery, where only the top three picks are lotteried off -- picks 4-10 will follow reverse of league finish, just like in the NBA).
  7. Draft lottery wherein the last-place finisher gets the best odds of getting first choice of all the draft slots (similar to #3 above, only in lottery form, and following NBA draft lottery rules as in #6 where 4th choice through 10th choice will follow reverse of league finish).
  8. Same as #6, except ALL picks will be lotteried off.
  9. Same as #7, except ALL draft slots will be chosen by teams, and the order of choosing will be entirely determined by lottery.

Monday, February 9, 2009

GAMES PLAYED BREAKDOWN

Hand-in-hand with Andy's attention-grabbing little bit on the league message board about injuries. . .

Back again to drop a little stat knowledge fo' dat ass (or doze asses, if you will). . .
Let's look at total Games Played this season, meaning the number of games that you have had players CONTRIBUTE to your team. . . If they sat on the bench the whole game, or they missed due to injury or because of their grandma's funeral, a playa doesn't count. If they played but got hurt in the first quarter, or only chipped in 2 points and 1 turnover before being unceremoniously benched for the rest of the game, the chump counts.

Here are the GP counts, through 15 weeks (in descending order of team rank in our standings):

Y-G-A - 676
Balding - 710
Del - 687
Nutcru - 671
Mao - 622
28 lyo - 605
Block O - 618
Brew-Ha - 642
Liberal - 613
Phi - 572


If you'll notice, the GP counts go down fairly well in line with the actual team standings. This might be expected, as you would think that some of the things that would lower your GP counts (injuries, poor day-to-day roster management) would go hand-in-hand with your team's ability to win games. But while a good GM tends to maximize the number of games available within their team, it should *not* be assumed that just because you have a lower GP count, you are a worse GM. Some of these factors, such as the uneven distribution of games played for each month across the whole NBA schedule, might weigh poorly against your team TO DATE, but will swing the other way in the months ahead. Other factors, such as injuries, are a combination of random poor luck and imprudent risk-taking in selection of players (ahem, Annan). A couple of anomalies to the overall curve would be Y-G-A overproducing on a per-game basis, Brew-Ha underproducing, and a subtle shuffle of teams in the 28 lyo/Block O/Liberal mix. Otherwise, everyone falls right in line.

One thing to note is that, at the extremes, this is an ABSURD difference in GP count-- Balding Ballers has 710 games over 15 weeks (47.33 games/week), while Phi Slamma Jamma's Injured All-Stars have merely 572 games over the same timeframe (38.13 games/week), which represents a 9.2 games/week difference, or 24% MORE games for Balding Ballers. That's like trying to match in 66 games the production that a normal player would get in 82 games, and that's damn difficult to do.

Now look at the GP counts AGAINST each of our teams-- the findings here are a little more interesting to me from an analytical standpoint, because it is entirely less in our control as individual owners. What I mean by that is this number looks at the total GP counts by all the teams that were FACING our team in any given week, and as a result, it just comes down to scheduling fortune, injury whims, and sloppy GM-smanship from our OPPONENTS on any given week. One would think that, over the course of the season, these GP counts would end up fairly consistent, and it would all pretty much wash out. However, AS OF RIGHT NOW, that does not appear to be the case. . .

Again, in descending order of team rank in our standings:

Y-G-A - 657
Balding - 642
Del - 652
Nutcru - 638
Mao - 600
28 lyo - 617
Block O - 637
Brew-Ha - 665
Liberal - 638
Phi - 626

A quick look confirms that the numbers overall are more "cunched" than the normal GP counts. At the extremes, you have Mao's cupcake schedule of only 600 games, and Brew-Ha's tougher schedule of 665 games. This 65-game disparity is still pretty substantial, representing a 4.33 games/week difference in average opponent, or just over 10% (the average number of games played/week for all teams, for the season, is 42.77). So that goes a long way to explain how Brew-Ha could have such difficulty living up to his own GP numbers, and it sheds some new light on Mao's season performance to date-- is his team a legit playoff contender, or are they inordinately overperforming because of the wimpy competition they have "lucked into" facing? Another thing to note is that Y-G-A has the 2nd-most GP-Against, which may be surprising (and is further proof of my dominance). In fact, all of the top 4 teams in the league (Y-G-A, Balding, Del, and Nutcru) represent the top half of the GP-Against rankings, which may suggest that when the average team faces us, they MAKE SURE to trade out their rosters as much as possible, to maximize the number of games played and give themselves the best shot at pulling out a win.

Finally, if you combine BOTH lists, and you subtract the GP-Against from the GP count, you have the GP-Difference for all teams in the league. . .

Y-G-A - (+19)
Balding - (+68)
Del - (+35)
Nutcru - (+33)
Mao - (+22)
28 lyo - (-12)
Block O - (-19)
Brew-Ha - (-23)
Liberal - (-25)
Phi - (-54)

Surprising or not, you'll notice that this list goes almost EXACTLY in descending order according to our team's total rankings this year. The one exception, of course, is mine own Y-G-A, further demonstrating statistical dominance by coming out on the top of the ranks despite only the 5th-best GP-Difference.

Y'all betta watch out.

Saturday, January 10, 2009

Looking toward Next Year

Following up on my last post in the league message board, I've done some analysis to see if having keepers will make the competitive balance any different from year to year. Obviously, it's all hypothetical at this point, but I don't think it does.

In any given year, each manager makes roster choices: which players to target, how high to reach for sleepers, how to achieve statistical balance, whether to achieve statistical balance, etc. (At least, every manager should do this. Maybe you all just come in to the draft trying to get the "best" player in a given spot, with no prior thought as to what makes a guy "better." In that case, the keeper system wouldn't be your biggest hurdle to success anyway.) Every year, each manager gets some right and gets some wrong. This will happen with keepers, too. There will be real-NBA roster changes that influence playing time, rookies emerging early creating positional log jams, trades, injuries, etc., that we will all do our best to foresee, but will never be entirely successful. As an initial matter, this is the biggest reason the keeper system won't make things unfair: the only way you can believe that is by believing that everyone will always make the correct keeper choices and will always dodge bad luck.

That being said, the point of the keeper system is to help you big your team more effectively while building in continuity from year to year, to make this more fun. You're trying to get an advantage. But everyone is doing this, just as everyone does it every draft.

Another argument (implied, as neither Annan nor anyone else has elaborated, so I'm spitballing) for why keepers might throw things off is that it constrains the player pool every draft; many of the high-upside guys will already be locked in to rosters, so your opportunities to improve your team via the draft are limited. This was the thing I wanted to explore more, and the results are below.

As I said, this is all hypothetical, but I've run a mock draft for next year with keepers involved so we can see some examples of rosters and compare them to what we have this year (or at the very least get a sense of how it might work, and what level of talent will be available at any given pick). I assumed a system where the last place team gets to pick their draft spot, and so on in reverse order of finish. I used our current standings as the league finish and guessed at where people would want to draft (just as I guessed at who people would want to pick). Obviously, this isn't perfect. We'll all have different views of player values and target strategies. I spent a lot of time on this, but I didn't stress too much about making sure that everyone picked the absolute best player at their spot. First of all, there's no way to know that in the middle of this season; rosters will change, etc. Second, there are always guys that fall in drafts, guys who are always undervalued, guys who are always overvalued, etc. I used what I thought I knew about each owner's proclivities and did the best I could, but I didn't go back through and tinker. The point wasn't to get a perfect draft, just an example of who was available at any given pick, and what rosters might look like in the end. If there is a guy you would have rather picked, you can at least see if he might have been available, and where you could have drafted him.

The results (click the pic for a larger, readable image; keepers are marked in yellow):


(For clarity purposes, "Il Mago" is Bargnani and "Super White" is Dunleavy.)

I'm not going to dissect the relative quality of each team (maybe Chris wants to tackle that, or someone else, I don't know), but each roster looks pretty normal to me. Nutcrushers could be potentially dominant if both Stuckey and Jeff Green take the next step in their evolution as players, and Block O and I get a nice value out of our young guards Eric Gordon and Westbrook, respectively. But really, these rosters don't look tons different than if we drafted from scratch. I'd have to think any keeper after third round level would have been drafted earlier than their keeper spot (which is why you kept them), but everybody's got a couple of good values, so it evens out. And there are potentially multiple guys in each round who could outperform any of the keepers (e.g., Lou Williams, Kirk Hinrich, and Luke Ridnour have just as much of a chance to perform as Jeff Green or Eric Gordon -- it's not like we're comparing Gordon to Reggie Evans).

So, as I see it, the only reason to think that money and keepers are incompatible is not based on any practical disparity in competitive balance, but merely an intellectual distaste for it. But I view it as a poker game. At the first hand, the slate is clean. But every subsequent hand, the slate is messy; some stacks are bigger than others, the button passes, each hand involves different balances of power, strategy, and opportunity. And yet, even with all of that, it still comes down to the cards, and everyone is at the same level when it comes to chance. It doesn't matter your skill level: if you don't get cards at the right times (or if you run into people who DO have cards), you're going to lose. And sometimes someone who doesn't know at all what they're doing gets lucky. That's the game. You have control over many elements, but luck still plays a big factor. And money is on the line, each and every hand. You don't equalize the stacks every time the deal passes around the table, right? And, as I think is illustrated above with the arguments and mock draft, nobody will ever be so short stacked or so big stacked as to greatly throw off the game. Nobody's going to get blinded out.

(I know there are obvious retorts to and holes in my analogy, but it helped me put things in perspective. We're playing a complicated game. This isn't like blackjack or roulette.)

Discuss.

Friday, January 2, 2009

The Lowdown on the Downlow

No, guys, I'm not talking about "hedonistic Bisexual Black men" (http://www.blackcommentator.com/149/149_cover_lowdown_downlow.html). . . I'm talking about Real Ultimate Fantasy Hoops Analysis. And I (regrettably/serendipitously?) came up with the title for this first mega-blog post before discovering the inane phrase's previous usage. Now I can't help sharing, and we're stuck with it, in all its pompous glory. Like a bunch of guys with a bunch of jars, just trying to tease out all the shards of glass. If you don't know what I'm talking about, PLEASE do yourself a favor and DON'T try to find out. Leave it as a vaguely suggestive symbol of unpleasantry.

So in all of the freaky fantasy punditry and pedantry that I have undertaken during these first nine weeks of the 2008-2009 NBA season, my spreadsheet-formulatin' ass has come up with a lot of intensive data that I certainly will never quite parse for all of its potential. And I found that a fitting metaphor for a lot of our fantasy squads (and indeed, for the NBA in general)-- there are a tremendous glut of talented players on our teams who may or may not "get there," and who mostly languish on the ends of our benches, or just on the outer cusp of the steady rotations of their real NBA teams. It's simply not possible to have all of these players pan out-- there aren't enough shots in a game or minutes in a season to go around and satisfy all of the J.J. Redicks and Kyle Lowrys of the world, so at some point we have to try to ignore all of those chump-asses and look very carefully at only the *most important* playas in the game (and in our fantasy squads).

So now that the NBA season is about 1/3 of the way complete and the ephemeral hot and cold streaks have turned into tangible, sustained patterns and trends, it's time for a first look at "The Big Picture"-- this column is an effort to trim the fat of our league, to look at the cores of our teams for now and the years to come, and to assess the Keeper Outlook for all of our teams.

I probably won't do this but maybe once or twice a year (if ever again, in fact), because I don't want to do ALL of the homework for you slackasses. And as the season grows longer, and our Keeper Declaration Deadline grows closer and closer, it is less likely that I will actually offer any perspective for you suckaz on "Who to Keep," because, let's face it-- I want you to make mistakes with this stuff. I want to *draft* the guys you should have KEPT. But I'm too nerdy and obsessive about this stuff not to share some of my thoughts, in this early stage of the game.

Obviously, there's a lot of basketball left to be played, and many trends will certainly change as young players emerge, old players fade, a select few players change teams, and overall team dynamics shift. But there are still some clear-cut favorites, the way I see it, who stand to benefit greatly from their current roster make-up in our elaborate Keeper Scheme. And then there's Angelo.

Without further ado, here are the picks that *I* would probably make if I were running the show for each of our teams (in alphabetical order), as well as some possible alternatives, some completely arbitrary “Keeper Grades,” and a lil' bit (ok, a lot) of running commentary:


From data pulled 12/26/08. . .

________________________________________

- 28 light years old -

PICKS:
Kobe Bryant - 1st round (playing at 1st-round level right now)
Chris Bosh - 2nd round (playing at 2nd-round level right now)
Jose Calderon - 3rd round (playing at 3rd-round level right now)
Jameer Nelson - 12th round (playing at 3rd-round level right now)

This team is in an interesting situation, in that they are the ONLY team (by my count) who would potentially Keep more than the first one or two players from this year's draft. But with the way Kobe, Bosh, and Calderon are playing, and with their ages and complementary stat lines, I think they'd represent a great first three picks for next year's draft. Throw in Jameer Nelson, who has absolutely blown up in Orlando (especially in the month of December), improving on virtually every single stat category from last year's performance, and you've got a nice lil' starting roster. The problem is. . . I'm not sure how much *value* they gain by "merely" having an awesome starting core for the draft. With these Keepers, Vivek would not have a pick until the 4th round of the draft. It's one of the biggest question marks that still remains about how this Keeper League format is going to work out-- whether it's better to Keep late-round "value" or "upside" guys, or to Keep your early-round, reliable Big Guns. Because of his team make-up, 28 light years old has almost no choice. A few other decent candidates remain, however, if any of the aforementioned picks falls out of favor.

ALTERNATIVES:
Ray Allen - 5th (3rd) - but I think he's just too old to use a Keeper on
Al Harrington - 8th (9th) - but he's shown some ability to blow up in his new digs at New York, and could well do the same into next year
D.J. Augustin - 14th (11th) - probably will improve, but it remains to be seen

OVERALL KEEPER GRADE: B+ (tied - 5 out of 10)
________________________________________

- Balding Ballers -

PICKS:
LeBron James – 1st (1st)
Paul Millsap – 7th (4th)
Wilson Chandler – 11th (8th)
Delonte West – 13th (4th)

Another interesting case here, where things could really change for the Ballers as the season (and next off-season) goes on. LeBron is a lock. Millsap could be a great Keeper (and would be a 7th-rounder right now, based on his 30th-place rank and our handy little formula for calculating the Keeper Round of undrafted free agents – square root of (160 * their actual rank)), especially if something happens with Carlos Boozer. Delonte West is playing out of his mind as a hyper-efficient complement to LeBron and Mo Williams, and Wilson Chandler could continue to benefit greatly from D’Antoni’s system in New York. Unfortunately for the Ballers, several “upside” guys who were perhaps drafted for Keeper purposes are simply borderline, at best—Kevin Durant (3rd), Michael Beasley (6th), Al Thornton (10th), and even LaMarcus Aldridge (7th). But then there are two Big Guns who are playing outstanding fantasy ball right now in Jason Kidd and Yao Ming, but who might just represent too much of a crapshoot for Keeper purposes. If Yao can (somehow, miraculously) stay healthy this whole year, he would probably be worth a Keeper. And if Jason Kidd can have successful hip replacement surgery, he might be too. They’re both just too uncertain for my liking, right now.

ALTERNATIVES:
Jason Kidd – 3rd (1st) – too damn old??
Yao Ming – 4th (2nd) – too risky??
Kevin Durant – 2nd (3rd) – good, but the jump up a round kills much of his value

OVERALL KEEPER GRADE: B (7 out of 10)
________________________________________

- Block O -

PICKS:
Chris Paul – 1st (1st)
Carlos Boozer – 2nd (3rd)
John Salmons – 9th (5th)
Marvin Williams – 11th (5th)

Chris Paul and anyone else basically makes your long-term prospects pretty decent. But Boozer is only there as a decent Keeper because he’s a good complement to Paul. And Salmons and Marvin Williams are two guys who are WAY better in fantasy than in real-life, but might just be good enough to Keep, as a result. Very low cost, high-reward. A small problem for Block O is that there aren’t a whole lot of alternate options if any of these picks seem like a stretch. They’re pretty loaded with underperformers like Sam Dalembert, Peja Stojakovic, and Tyson Chandler. Not a team that I’d want to be in charge of. Although I’d obviously love to have Chris Paul to build my team around for the next 3 years.

ALTERNATIVES:
Rudy Fernandez – 10th (8th) – but his production is too inconsistent
Boris Diaw – 12th (16th) – but his performance in Charlotte has been pretty great

OVERALL KEEPER GRADE: C+ (8 out of 10)
________________________________________

- Brew-Ha Bandits -

PICKS:
Deron Williams – 1st (2nd)
Mo Williams – 7th (5th)
Steve Blake – 9th (6th)
Tayshaun Prince – 11th (8th)

Perhaps predictably, the future does not look very bright for the Brew-Ha Bandits, one of the current bottom-feeders of our league. Personally, I’m not sold on Deron Williams as a 1st-rounder next year. And when Steve Blake and Tayshaun Prince are two of your four Keepers, you’re hurting pretty bad. But there isn’t much else here at all to work with, as Brew-Ha famously spent a 1st-rounder this year on Shawn Marion, and has practically two or three rosters’ worth of underperformers like Michael Redd, Luol Deng, and slightly-above-mediocre guys like Andrei Kirilenko and Troy Murphy. And those are some of the *notable* guys. Yikes! Sounds like time to swing a deal or few. I’m ashamed to be in the very low company of Liberal Elite Media as the only teams that have lost to the Brew-Ha Bandits so far this year, but I’m surprised and impressed that many of the losses have been fairly close. Still, there’s a lot of ground to make up the rest of this season, or in the draft next year with these Keepers.

ALTERNATIVES:
Marcus Camby – 2nd (1st) – but he’s too damn old
Ronnie Brewer – 10th (10th) – good upside, but is it good enough??

OVERALL KEEPER GRADE: F+ (10 out of 10)
________________________________________

- Del Harris Del Negro -

PICKS:
Dwyane Wade – 1st (1st)
Rajon Rondo – 8th (4th)
Spencer Hawes – 10th (8th)
Nate Robinson – 12th (6th)

To my eyes, Del Harris has a great line-up for our Keeper system, including a top-flight Fantasy Dominator in Dwyane Wade and a number of solid late-round guys who are looking like they could provide a great foundation for the next couple of years. The great thing about this team is that they will still have the flexibility to add valuable parts with picks in rounds 2 through 7 before the Keepers start locking into draft spots. So they could be a really deep team next year right out of the gate. And several alternatives could easily jump to the fore and take a spot from, say, Spencer Hawes. There’s a lot of value deep in the roster (for instance, I’m sure Nutcrushers would be happy to have a mulligan on Russell Westbrook), and even potential for a couple of highly-drafted guys in Joe Johnson and Andris Biedrins to slide into Keeperdom. On the flipside, Del could be one of the most likely teams NEXT YEAR to lament the loss of a few guys he “woulda, coulda, shoulda Kept” if things don’t quite turn out as well as hoped with his precious four selections. Tough spot to be in.

ALTERNATIVES:
Joe Johnson – 2nd (2nd) – good, but the jump up a round kills much of his value
Andris Biedrins – 5th (5th) – too inconsistent
Russell Westbrook – 14th (14th) – too risky, but huge upside

OVERALL KEEPER GRADE: A- (tied – 3 out of 10)
________________________________________

- Liberal Elite Media -

PICKS:
Dwight Howard – 1st (7th)
Josh Smith – 2nd (11th)
Derrick Rose – 7th (7th)
Chris Duhon – 11th (6th)

The future is bleak for Liberal Elite Media. The main problem is that Dwight Howard and Josh Smith are almost too good and too young NOT to Keep, but also that Angelo doesn’t seem to know how to build a successful team around either of them. Derrick Rose and Duhon are nice, but could easily disappear into thin air with inefficient play. Beyond these four, there’s slim pickings in the rest of the roster. You’ll find more players who could be dropped outright from Liberal Elite’s current roster than could end up valuable Keeper candidates. So best of luck trying to figure out how to win with Dwight Howard. “Help me Superman, you’re my only hope!”

ALTERNATIVES:
David Lee – 6th (5th) – good, but the jump up a round kills much of his value
Trevor Ariza – 11th (8th) – too inconsistent
Grant Hill – 15th (12th) – too old

OVERALL KEEPER GRADE: D- (9 out of 10)
________________________________________

- Mao Meow ZeMeow -

PICKS:
Chauncey Billups – 3rd (2nd)
Zach Randolph – 9th (5th)
Ben Gordon – 10th (4th)
Nene Hilario – 11th (3rd)

Nice lil’ situation here, and perhaps the antithesis of the front-loaded scenario that a few other teams (like 28 light years old) find themselves in. Mao has a few early-rounders that it would be really tough to spend a Keeper on this year (Garnett, Caron Butler, and Andrew Bynum in the first three rounds), but an enormous glut of late-rounders who are far outperforming their draft position or who have some reasonable potential to do so next year. Randolph is playing very well even AFTER his trade to the Clippers (but may lose value depending on how the frontcourt rotation shakes out there with Camby and Kaman), and Ben Gordon and Nene Hilario represent perhaps two of the Top 5 biggest overperformances/breakouts of anyone in the league this year (right up there in the running with Jameer Nelson, Delonte West, Mike Bibby, Jason Kidd, Jason Terry, and Devin Harris—is it any coincidence that these are all PG-ish or small SG types, other than Hilario???). Additionally, Billups has reignited the fire in Denver, and could continue to do so through next season as well.

ALTERNATIVES:
Roger Mason – 11th (8th) – too inconsistent
Zydrunas Ilgauskas – 11th (7th) – too old
Kendrick Perkins – 15th (14th) – too inconsistent
Udonis Haslem – 15th (10th) – too mediocre, come on! Udonis Haslem???

OVERALL KEEPER GRADE: B+ (tied – 5 out of 10)
________________________________________

- Nutcrushers -

PICKS:
Amare Stoudemire – 1st (1st)
Al Jefferson – 2nd (2nd)
O.J. Mayo – 8th (5th)
Rodney Stuckey – 12th (10th)

If there is one silver lining from the otherwise-abysmal Nowitzki/Roy/Okur for Amare/Iverson trade (sorry—I can’t help myself from mentioning it at every opportunity), it’s that Nutcrushers swapped a 30-year-old PF in the latter stages of his prime for a 26-year-old PF/C who should (theoretically) just be entering the most productive statistical years of his career. For Keeper purposes, what else could you want? This allows for the 1-2 Keeper Combo of Amare and Al Jefferson to be the extremely solid frontcourt foundation of Nutcrushers for the foreseeable future (or at least until he swings another bad trade—doh!). Throw in any combination that includes some of the most exciting young players with Golden Opportunities to Blossom in the next couple of years, and you have what I would call perhaps the most enviable Keeper position of any team in our league. If “Orenthal James” Mayo can possibly improve on his completely awesome rookie year, he might turn out to be the steal of this year’s AND the NEXT THREE YEARS’ drafts (although he has shown signs of mortality of late), and Rodney Stuckey’s newfound starting opportunity is already starting to pay off in spades. If any of these guys falter, there’s Brook Lopez and Jeff Green who could both turn into tremendous steals in next year’s draft in the 12th or 13th round, respectively. And James Posey ain’t bad either, especially as a 15th-rounder. This team looks scary. If anything, there are almost TOO many possibilities here.

ALTERNATIVES:
Brook Lopez – 12th (8th) – nothing wrong with going this way
Jeff Green – 13th (9th) – nothing wrong with going this way either
James Posey – 15th (8th) – deeeeamn, nothing wrong here either; perhaps a little old

OVERALL KEEPER GRADE: A (2 out of 10)
________________________________________

- Phi Slamma Jamma -

PICKS:
Rashard Lewis – 2nd (2nd)
Gilbert Arenas – 6th (2nd round potential)
Mike Bibby – 8th (3rd)
Monta Ellis – 10th (4th round potential)

This is probably the most obvious case where an Owner in our league really considered Keeper values when he went into this year’s draft, and perhaps reached on a few players (Arenas and Ellis, namely) where he could have gotten better value for this year, but instead sacrificed that for a shot at sustained dominance for years to come. As a result, and because of the make-up of these two players’ undeniably immense talent, the nature of their frightening injuries, and the dynamics of their slashing- and quickness-based offensive skill sets, I see this as a potential All-or-Nothing situation for Phi Slamma. Not to mention that there are very slim pickings in the rest of the Phi Slamma line-up, at least as far as Keeper considerations are concerned. So if Arenas and Ellis bounce back into prime or near-prime form next year (not even *this* year), Phi Slamma could have ALREADY lined up some top-quality talent in the 6th and 10th rounds of next year’s draft, respectively. Then with Rashard Lewis’s very unique statistical line and Mike Bibby’s unlikely resurgence in Atlanta, you have a couple of other quality Keepers in the mix. Now, on the flipside, I don’t think Phi Slamma has ANY other way to go, with guys like Richard Jefferson, Emeka Okafor, Baron Davis, Shaquille O’Neal, Elton Brand, and (gag!) Tracy McGrady (the oldest 29-year-old on the planet) making up the *good* players on his roster. It looks like the one player there who is most likely to live up to this year’s draft spot is the one you would *least* consider for Keeper purposes—36-year-old Shaquille O’Neal. Good luck, Phi Slamma. I hope it doesn’t work out for you.

ALTERNATIVES:
Larry Hughes – 15th (10th) – too Larry Hughes

OVERALL KEEPER GRADE: A+/C- (1 out of 10)*

* - If Arenas and/or Ellis don’t spring back to full strength, the team unravels to a C- and 8th out of 10; personally, I'd put my money that we end up somewhere in between, but closer to the A+ than the C-
________________________________________

- Young-Gay-Artest -

PICKS:
Dirk Nowitzki – 1st (1st)
Danny Granger – 2nd (2nd)
Brandon Roy – 3rd (2nd)
Devin Harris – 6th (2nd)

Finally on to my team. I like my team. I like my team quite a bit, in fact. But I’m not 100% sold on them this year *or* next year, and the thing about my team is that they are perhaps the one team in our league that, due to Keeper selections, is MOST LIKELY to resemble the same team NEXT year that they are THIS year. So right now, I have an extremely deep team with at least 4, 5, or maybe even 6 guys who could reasonably finish the year with a ranking in the Yahoo! Top 20. But I still might not win the league, because of all of the overlapping talent and duplicated statistical performance. But basically, with this year and (as I see it) with next year, as Dirk, Granger, Roy, and Harris go, my team goes. That said, it could be *very* nice to get borderline 1st- and 2nd-round value out of the 1st, 2nd, 3rd, and 6th rounds right off the bat. It’s just going to be especially important (and tricky) to flesh out the entire remainder of my line-up by finding the diamonds in the rough in the later stages of the draft. Now, there *are* a few reasonable alternatives in the mix, with players who are decently outperforming their draft standing right now (or could easily do so the rest of the year), but none of them are exactly spring chickens (Vince Carter, Jason Terry, Manu Ginobili) whether they could continue at a high level next year is a difficult question that will probably take the remainder of the season to predict adequately.

ALTERNATIVES:
Vince Carter – 4th (3rd) – too risky
Jason Terry – 8th (2nd) – too old
Manu Ginobili – 10th (10th) – too old, but might spring back
Rafer Alston – 11th (9th) – too inconsistent

OVERALL KEEPER GRADE: A- (tied – 3 out of 10)